[Updated 27 August 2026 based on 2026-2027FY rates and caps]
When you start an account-based pension, one important decision is what should happen to the remaining balance when you die.
Two common options are:
Both options can provide greater certainty, but they work differently and can have different tax, transfer balance cap, Centrelink and estate planning consequences.
The options available will also depend on the rules of your super fund.
Unlike many other assets, your super does not automatically pass according to your will. Your super fund will generally pay your death benefit to:
Dependants under superannuation law can include your spouse, children of any age, someone financially dependent on you or someone with whom you have an interdependency relationship. Important to note that not every dependant is eligible to receive a death benefit as an income stream. For example, an independent adult child will generally need to receive their benefit as a lump sum.
Also, a dependant for superannuation law purposes is different from being considered a dependant for tax purposes. What this means is that someone may be eligible to receive your super directly but still pay tax on part of the benefit (the taxable component).
A reversionary pension nomination is generally made when an account-based pension is established.
It directs the pension to automatically continue to an eligible beneficiary, most commonly a spouse, following the original pensioner’s death.
Provided the nomination is valid, the beneficiary remains eligible and the fund rules allow it, the pension does not cease on death. Instead, the beneficiary becomes entitled to receive the continuing pension.
A reversionary pension can offer several practical benefits.
There are also some important limitations and things to ensure you have considered with reversionary pension nominations.
A binding death benefit nomination directs the trustee to pay your super death benefit to your nominated SIS dependants, usually in specified proportions. It can also direct the benefit to your Legal Personal Representative (LPR), so it flows through your estate and is distributed under your Will.
Depending on your fund’s rules, a binding nomination can leave open whether the benefit is taken as a lump sum or, where the beneficiary is eligible, as an income stream.
It really depends.
When assessing which type of nomination is appropriate, you should consider your specific circumstances, estate planning objectives, need for flexibility and other factors such as grandfathering of an account based pension for social security purposes.
Also, it’s not always either/or, and I think the “versus” framing is a bit misleading, as you may have different nominations for your different superannuation interests/accounts.
In making a decision the most important thing is to make sure you have thought through the implications and how this fits in with your broader estate planning strategy.
This is the one we see missed most often.
A reversionary nomination only attaches to the pension it’s made on. If you’re only moving part of your super into an account based pension — because of the transfer balance cap, or because you’re still working, or simply by choice — the balance left in accumulation isn’t covered. Neither is any insurance held in super, which is credited to your accumulation account when a claim is paid.
It’s entirely possible to have a carefully constructed reversionary pension and a six-figure accumulation account with no valid nomination on it at all. Make sure every account is covered.
Couples ask this often, and the honest answer is that it depends on your fund’s rules and where you live.
Where the order of death can’t be determined, state survivorship laws generally deem the elder to have died first and the younger to have survived. In Victoria that’s section 184 of the Property Law Act 1958, and this applied to a reversionary pension can mean the pension reverts to your spouse and then forms part of their estate, distributed under their Will (which may not be what either of you intended, particularly in a blended family). In contrast, a binding nomination to your LPR keeps the benefit within your own estate and your own Will. That isn’t automatically better, but it is a different outcome.
Neither a reversionary pension nor a binding nomination will automatically resolve every simultaneous-death or succession scenario. Complex arrangements, particularly those involving blended families, may require specialist estate planning advice.
Super law and tax law use different definitions of “dependant”, and the gap between them is where most of the unexpected tax sits.
This is particularly important when nominating adult children.
An independent adult child can generally receive a super death benefit as a lump sum, but may pay tax on the taxable component. By comparison, a death benefit paid as a lump sum to a dependant for tax purposes is generally tax-free.
The tax treatment of a death benefit income stream can also depend on:
The tax consequences should therefore be considered separately from the question of who is legally eligible to receive the benefit.
Your tax components lock in. When you commence an account based pension, the proportion of tax-free to taxable component is fixed at that point and applies to every payment and every eventual death benefit from that pension. If a withdrawal and recontribution strategy is something you’d consider to improve that proportion, it needs to happen before the pension commences, not after.
Your transfer balance cap. Commencing a pension uses your personal transfer balance cap. The general cap is $2.1 million for 2026–27, but your personal cap depends on your own history and can be checked through ATO online services via myGov.
It’s also worth understanding what happens to your beneficiary’s cap: a death benefit pension counts towards their cap too. Where it doesn’t fit, they’ll need to commute their own pension back to accumulation or take a lump sum out of super. Death benefit money can’t simply be rolled back into accumulation phase.
Before you commence a pension and make a decision, it’s worth being able to answer these:
If you have any questions regarding reversionary pensions or binding death benefit nominations, feel free to schedule a chat with one of our experienced financial planners.
General advice warning
This article contains general information and general advice only. It has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on any of this information, you should consider its appropriateness having regard to your own circumstances and, where relevant, obtain and consider the Product Disclosure Statement for any financial product before deciding to acquire it. Taxation and superannuation rules are complex and subject to change. You should seek advice from a qualified financial adviser, and where appropriate a solicitor or registered tax agent, before making any decision. Figures quoted are current for the 2026–27 financial year. Wealth Collective Pty Ltd trading as Pekada (ABN 95 624 612 684), Corporate Authorised Representative No. 1263725 of Communitas Wealth Pty Ltd, AFSL 500551.
Pete is the Co-Founder, Principal Adviser and oversees the investment committee for Pekada. He has over 18 years of experience as a financial planner. Based in Melbourne, Pete is on a mission to help everyday Australians achieve financial independence and the lifestyle they dream of. Pete has been featured in Australian Financial Review, Money Magazine, Super Guide, Domain, American Express and Nest Egg. His qualifications include a Masters of Commerce (Financial Planning), SMSF Association SMSF Specialist Advisor™ (SSA) and Certified Investment Management Analyst® (CIMA®).